The Calhoun Institute Publius’s Political Science | The Calhoun Institute

Publius’s Political Science

Constitution

Publius’s Political Science

 

John A. Ferejohn, Roderick M. Hills, Jr., New York University School of Law, February 1, 2016, NYU School of Law, Public Law Research Paper No. 16-03

Abstract: “Publius,” the collective author of The Federalist, was not just a polemicist and normative theorist but also a political scientist. We argue that the political psychology, and institutional predictions that comprise The Federalist are best understood as political science, because the predictions could be – and were – revised in light of “that best oracle of wisdom, experience” (Federalist 15). After outlining some “maintained hypotheses” about human nature that undergird The Federalist, we describe three respects in which James Madison revised, in light of post-1790 experience, Publius’ institutional predictions. The Federalist pressed the view that the national legislature would be the most powerful branch, requiring the Constitution to bolster the implied powers of the executive, limit states’ power, and dampen direct popular participation by the People themselves. After the successes of Hamilton’s initiatives demonstrated the potency of the Presidency during the 1790s, Madison radically revised all three of these institutional predictions, calling for limits on implied presidential powers, a broad construction of states’ reserved authority, and, most dramatically, popular participation through disciplined political parties. Rather than view these revisions as abandoning the political theory of The Federalist, we argue that Madison and Hamilton both retained Publius’s foundational normative assumptions, while revising their predictions about institutional behavior in light of the empirical evidence – precisely the proper response of an empirically oriented political scientist. In this sense, Hamilton’s and Madison’s post-ratification breach was less a retreat by either from Publius’ political theory and more a confirmation of the status of The Federalist as, in part, political science revised in light of political experience.

Number of Pages in PDF File: 47

[CI] Alternatively, the post ratification change of perspective may actually illuminate some truths in the pre-ratification antifederalist arguments.

About the Author

Barry Clark
I am a Southerner, a father, husband and Christian and a soon to be retired field grade officer on active duty in the Army; I have served for just over thirty years. I spent four years of my youth at The Citadel in Charleston . I am neither a theologian nor a professional historian. I do however ask many questions and endeavor to find answers and I believe, or at least hope, that I think critically and with the understanding that God provides. http://www.calhouninstitute.com/about-barry-clark/

Be the first to comment on "Publius’s Political Science"

Leave a comment

Your email address will not be published.


*